Comments on: Louis Roederer Cristal Champagne 1999

jasmin muller rated it and said:

the 99 i dont like ,theres a hugh difference in taste between the 99 and 97. ' 97 is delicious

Peter Townsend rated it and said:

I bought this following all the hype it has received. All i can say is wow! i desperately wanted it to be dissapointing (especially for the price!), but unfortunately for my wallet it really outlived my expectations. I am no wine buff but every sip was packed with gentle fruit flavours, plenty of fizz without being over the top, and just the right amount of biscuity after taste. it is far superior to both the vintage krug (too heavy for me), and the dom perignon (sorry, i just dont rate it). my advice would be to try any of the roederer range, and if it is your kind of champagne, then try the best- you will not be dissapointed.

Jim Wiegand rated it and said:

The Emperors clothes. This is a bottle for suckers. Costs 220.00 and is a 35-40 dollar Chamagne. Not the great Champagne it once was several decades ago. Profit is now king with a seemingly endless supply available for the elitists

Jim Wiegand rated it and said:

The Emperors clothes. This is a bottle for suckers. Costs 220.00 and is a 35-40 dollar Chamagne. Not the great Champagne it once was several decades ago. Profit is now king with a seemingly endless supply available for the elitists

Howard Digby-Johns rated it and said:

Sublime, and drinking perfectly now.